First, the LDS blog, New Cool Thang, fired me up with their charge of bibliolatry among evangelicals.
Secondly, Alister McGrath provoked my thoughts on Christian bibliolatry when I read his book, The Dawkins Delusion? Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine (Intervarsity Press, 2007), castigating both atheist and Christian fundamentalism.
Thirdly, Ted Olsen chimes in on the Christianity Today blog with Moreland’s accusations of bibliolatry among evangelicals. Today, I noticed Francis Beckwith’s sensitive comment in the thread on “Roman magisterium”.
And I also, today, read Blake Ostler’s post on New Cool Thang that could be helpful in explaining Mormon magisterium (if this would be an accepted term by LDS).
I initiated my first question on bibliolatry last Friday. But now, I want to backup to a section I read in McGrath’s book on NOMA (nonoverlapping magisteria) and POMA (partially overlapping magisteria).
I am wondering if there would be a common link where McGrath, Beckwith, and Ostler all believe in POMA, whereas some conservative evangelicals and Christian fundamentalists believe in nonoverlapping magisteria of Scripture.
Here is an excerpt from McGrath’s latest book fleshing this out: (more…)