In the FARMS Review 19/1 (2007), Dan Peterson writes in response to Roger D. Launius’ criticism of Richard Bushman’s Rough Stone Rolling.
On page xxxix of the Introduction, Peterson writes,
Unsurprisingly, Launius rejects the antiquity of the Book of Mormon. To question the book’s historicity, he announces, “does not cast into doubt the legitimacy of the religion nearly so much as Bushman seems to believe. All religions–all ideologies–are predicated on myth and symbol and they are not any less useful, compelling, and true because of it.”
I strongly disagree with Launius.
Interestly, Peterson responds,
Well, yes and no. Would it really make no difference to Christianity, say, if it were somehow proven that the resurrection, and indeed the life, of Jesus Christ were mere fiction? Would the zeal of Christians around the world continue unabated in such a case? That seems highly unlikely. Are liberal Christian denominations prospering? It will not, I hope, be considered uncharitable for me to observe that the contrasting historical and demographic trajectories of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its more liberal “Reorganized” cousin, currently called the Community of Christ, strongly suggest that abandoning literal belief on core matters makes a palpable difference (xl).
Is the Community of Christ liberal? Is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints headed in this direction?
On the blog, By Common Consent, read what Community of Christ scholar, David H., has to say.
